← all works
Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
- Teacher spread
- 0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Cell Death and Differentiation
- Topic
- Cell death mechanisms and regulation
- Field
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Canadian institutions
- University of Toronto
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesMedical Research CouncilEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute on Drug AbuseWellcome Trust
- Keywords
- Biology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no