Resource Allocation Techniques in Cooperative Cognitive Radio Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past decade, cognitive radio and cooperative communication techniques have been proposed in the literature for efficiently utilizing the radio resources. Cognitive radio is an emerging technology intended to enhance the utilization of the radio frequency spectrum. The cooperative communication system, with the same total power and bandwidth of legacy wireless communication systems, can increase the data rate of the future wireless communication system. A combination of cognitive radio with cooperative communication can further improve the future wireless network performance. Efficient resource allocation in cooperative cognitive radio network (CRN) is essential in order to meet the challenges of future wireless networks. In this article, a survey of resource allocation in cooperative CRN is presented. We discuss the taxonomy of objectives and protocols used in the literature for resource allocation in cooperative CRN. This paper also highlights the use of power control, cooperation types, network configurations and decision types used in cooperative CRN. Finally, directions for future research are outlined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it