MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997162279 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n10p100

Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Evidence from Malaysia

2012· article· en· W1997162279 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohd Shahidan Shaari, Thien Ho Hong, Siti Norwahida Shukeri

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Business and FDI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign direct investmentGranger causalityCointegrationGross domestic productEconomicsVector autoregressionError correction modelProduct (mathematics)EconometricsReal gross domestic productMonetary economicsInvestment (military)Causality (physics)International economicsMacroeconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to examine the relationship of foreign direct investment on real gross domestic product in Malaysia using annually data from1971 until 2010. VAR model with cointegration technique is applied to examine the effect of foreing direct investment on real gross domestic product in Malaysia. Vector Error Correction model (VECM) is used to analyze the short run effect of the two variables in Malaysia. Granger causality is also employed to see the causal effect of foreing direct invesement and real grsoss domestic product. Our main findings reveal that the increase in foreign direct investment has given a good impact on Malaysian economic growth. Specifically, 1% permanent increase in the level of foreign direct investment causes the level of Malaysian gross domestic product to increase by 49.135%. By using granger causality, it is found that GDP has granger cause to FDI and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicInternational Business and FDIFrench-language works237,207