MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997162636 · doi:10.1353/mou.0.0034

The Meaning of Pons in the Inscription of Adrastus ( CIL 6.1585)

2007· article· fr· W1997162636 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martin J. Beckmann

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)PonsArtPhilosophyMedicineAnatomyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une inscription de 193 ap. J-C. (CIL VI, 1585b) rapporte une permission impériale donnée à Adrastus, procurateur de la colonne de Marc Aurèle, de construire une grande maison derrière la colonne. Le texte mentionne que deux charretées de bois d’œuvre doivent être données à Adrastus cum pontem necesse fuit compigni . Les commentaires des éditeurs proposaient de comprendre ce pons comme un genre de passerelle, de trottoir ou de passage pour piéton. Nous pensons au contraire que ce pons n’a rien à voir avec la colonne : ce serait plutôt l’échafaudage de bois nécessaire à la construction de la maison d’Adrastus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207