Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a corrective to the depersonalizing tendencies of some caregiving practices and treatment contexts, the principles of person-centred care have been widely espoused. However, proponents of person-centred care often fail to acknowledge the fact that the body is a fundamental means of communication and, as such, the body is essential to the expression of personhood. Using a qualitative research design, we explored with health care practitioners how an embodied notion of personhood could enhance person-centred dementia care. Our findings indicate that the communicative capacity of the body enriches the imagination and connects health practitioners to the personhood of their care recipients, thereby fostering sympathetic care. Our findings further indicate that health care practitioners perceive that when care is premised on the communicative capacity of the body, this may improve the time efficiency of clinical practice, and may reduce, in certain instances, the need for drug therapy as chemical restraint. Further research is needed in order to evaluate the outcomes of an embodied selfhood approach to person-centred dementia care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it