Online re‐dispatching of power systems based on modal sensitivity identification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sensitivity approach has been widely used for various re‐dispatching problems in power systems. The conventional sensitivity approach depends heavily on the detailed system model hence it suffers from the model bias problem. Existing sensitivity identification methods can indeed release the requirement of the system model, but the commonly‐used constant sensitivity assumption is inconsistent with the actual situation. To solve this problem, this study proposes an online sensitivity identification method with the ability to track the system operating conditions. A general online re‐dispatching procedure integrated with the proposed method is then introduced for various re‐dispatching problems. Since the proposed method is data oriented and is comparable with the model‐based method, it facilitates online implementation of the conventional sensitivity‐based re‐dispatching method. The key issue of the proposed approach, online sensitivity identification, is validated in a two‐area four‐machine system, compared with the conventional model‐based method. Finally, the effectiveness of the whole re‐dispatching procedure is demonstrated in a large complex system, China Southern Grid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it