The reductive deposition of quaternary pyridinium corrosion inhibitor multilayers on glassy carbon electrodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The redox behaviour of several quaternary pyridinium corrosion inhibitors ("Quats") at glassy carbon (GC) electrodes has been investigated in neutral aqueous solutions. The primary emphasis is on n-butyl-3-(N-octyl carbamyl)pyridinium bromide, one of the Quats determined to have very good corrosion inhibition properties based on parallel weight loss experiments. It is demonstrated that the reduction of the Quats, which occurs in a two-electron reaction at potentials negative of 1.0 V vs. SSCE, results in the formation of a neutral product. This forms a porous film on the electrode surface, with clusters that expand and thicken as more Quat deposits, as confirmed by atomic force microscopy. The film charge density reaches a maximum of ~4 mC/cm2, equivalent to more than 100 monolayers of Quat, after which no further Quat can be deposited, suggesting full surface coverage by a nonconducting product. The Quat multilayer can then be redissolved at potentials positive of ~ 0.2 V, during its oxidation back to its original solution-soluble form. Key words: quaternarized pyridinium compounds, reductive film deposition, glassy carbon, multilayer, corrosion inhibitors, cyclic voltammetry, AFM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".