MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997248037 · doi:10.3139/217.1676

In-line Ultrasonic Monitoring of Filler Dispersion during Extrusion

2002· article· en· W1997248037 on OpenAlex
J. Tatibouët, Michel A. Huneault

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Polymer Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDispersion (optics)PolypropyleneExtrusionComposite materialPlastics extrusionRheologyFiller (materials)AttenuationScanning electron microscopeDie swellExtrusion mouldingUltrasonic sensorOptical microscopeOpticsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mechanical and rheological properties of filled polymers are very sensitive to the filler dispersion. Classical methods for evaluating dispersion are based on optical or scanning electron microscopy observations on extruded specimens. They cannot be used in-line and are generally time consuming. We present here an in-line characterisation technique to evaluate the dispersion of calcium carbonate, CaCO 3 , in polypropylene. The technique is based on the monitoring of velocity and attenuation of ultrasounds in the flowing material. These properties are measured in a specially instrumented die placed at the end of a single screw extruder. Measurements were made for filler concentrations up to 60 wt.%. In-line data are compared to dispersion indexes measured by an optical method on 25 micron thick films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it