MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997248037 · doi:10.3139/217.1676

In-line Ultrasonic Monitoring of Filler Dispersion during Extrusion

2002· article· en· W1997248037 on OpenAlexaff
J. Tatibouët, Michel A. Huneault

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Polymer Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDispersion (optics)PolypropyleneExtrusionComposite materialPlastics extrusionRheologyFiller (materials)AttenuationScanning electron microscopeDie swellExtrusion mouldingUltrasonic sensorOptical microscopeOpticsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mechanical and rheological properties of filled polymers are very sensitive to the filler dispersion. Classical methods for evaluating dispersion are based on optical or scanning electron microscopy observations on extruded specimens. They cannot be used in-line and are generally time consuming. We present here an in-line characterisation technique to evaluate the dispersion of calcium carbonate, CaCO3, in polypropylene. The technique is based on the monitoring of velocity and attenuation of ultrasounds in the flowing material. These properties are measured in a specially instrumented die placed at the end of a single screw extruder. Measurements were made for filler concentrations up to 60 wt.%. In-line data are compared to dispersion indexes measured by an optical method on 25 micron thick films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Polymer ProcessingSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207