MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997262812 · doi:10.1080/08935690410001676221

Rhetoric, ideology, and the social totality: Kenneth Burke, Fredric Jameson, and the Althusserian Tradition

2004· article· en· W1997262812 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Carmichael

Bibliographic record

VenueRethinking Marxism · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMarxism and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyRhetoricPhilosophyField (mathematics)EpistemologySociologyAction (physics)PsychoanalysisLiteraturePoliticsLawArtLinguisticsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the field of modern American cultural critique, Kenneth Burke has long seemed an acutely proleptic figure; however, Fredric Jameson has on occasion been critical of the limits of Burke’s notion of symbolic action. This paper argues that Jameson’s dissatisfaction overlooks the ways in which the great problematics of Althusserian Marxism and the logic of their resolutions are indeed fully present in Burke’s engagement with Marx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.060
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRethinking MarxismSame topicMarxism and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207