MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997263453 · doi:10.4138/656

Oligocene benthic foraminifera from the Paleogene Wenonah Canyon, Scotian Shelf – normal versus canyon assemblages

2005· article· en· W1997263453 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
F C Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanyonGeologyForaminiferaBenthic zonePaleogeneCenozoicPaleontologyOceanographyGeomorphologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Petro-Canada Shell Wenonah J-75 well was drilled at the site of the mid Cenozoic "Wenonah Canyon" under the Scotian Shelf. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages recovered from sidewall core samples in the Oligocene section are unusually low in species diversity, though high in numbers of specimens. Such oligospecific assemblages may be the result of unusual hydrological factors in the canyon sediments at the time of deposition. In marked contrast, a nearby well, Canterra et al. Whycocomagh N-90, drilled outside the deepest canyon area, contains normal, more diverse, benthic slope assemblages. A seismic section acquired near the Wenonah site shows the informally designated Ypresian Acadia chalk to be truncated by canyon development. Planktic foraminifera of early Ypresian age do occur in Wenonah J-75, however, suggesting that the Acadia chalk may in fact be confined to the upper Ypresian. RÉSUMÉ Le puits Wenonah J-75 de Petro-Canada/Shell a été foré à l'emplacement du « canyon Wenonah » du Cénozoïque moyen, sous la Plate-forme Scotian. Les assemblages de foraminifères benthiques récupérés des échantillons de carottes latérales dans la section de l'Oligocène, présentent une diversité d'espèces exceptionnellement faible, malgré le nombre élevé de spécimens. Ces assemblages oligospécifiques pourraient être dus à des facteurs hydrologiques inhabituels dans les sédiments du canyon au moment du dépôt. À l'opposé tout à fait, un puits proche, le puits Whycocomagh N-90, de Canterra et coll., foré à l'extérieur du secteur le plus profond du canyon, renferme des assemblages de pentes benthiques plus diversifiés et normaux. Une section sismique prélevée près de l'emplacement de Wenonah révèle que la craie officieusement désignée craie yprésienne d'Acadia est tronquée par le développement du canyon. Des foraminifères planctoniques de la période de l'Yprésien précoce sont présents dans le puits Wenonah J-75, ce qui laisse toutefois supposer que la craie d'Acadia pourrait en fait être confinée à l'Yprésien supérieur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeologySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207