Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Since 2003 the MOST (Microvariability and Oscillations of STars) microsatellite has obtained typically a month of non-stop, minute-of-time resolution, high-precision, single-broadband optical photometry for each of a significant number of Galactic OB and WR stars. Numerous p- and g-modes were clearly detected in several OB stars, including discovery of g-modes for the first time in a blue supergiant (Saio et al. 2006). True rotation periods were found for some SPBe pulsators (Cameron et al. 2008). Many O stars are remarkably quiet. Five presumably single WR stars have been observed so far, each interesting in its own way. In particular, the cool WR stars WR123 (WN8) and WR103 (WC9d) both show mostly short-lived, multimode oscillations with most of the Fourier power occurring on a day or longer timescale (Moffat et al. 2008a). WR123 also revealed a fairly stable 10-hour periodicity (Lefèvre et al. 2005). All of these oscillations probably arise in the stellar cores. WR111 (WC5) shows no (coherent) oscillations above the detection limit of 0.05 mmag in the 10-minute period range predicted for strange-mode pulsations at a level of 2 mmag (Moffat et al. 2008b). WR110 (WN5-6 and a stronger-than-average X-ray source) and WR124 (WN8h, i.e. in contrast with the previously observed, hydrogen-free WR123 of otherwise similar subtype), both strongly variable with MOST, are currently being analyzed. The next target just observed (late-June to early Aug 2009) is the 30-day eclipsing binary CV Ser = WR113 (WC8d + O8-9IV). Besides stellar oscillations, we will also search for orbital-phase dependent, stochastic variability in CV Ser as wind clumps in the WR component's dense wind pass in front of the O-star.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".