MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hematoma retroperitoneal espontáneo inducido por enoxiparina a dosis terapéuticas

2003· article· es· W1997302199 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo Gómez de la Torre, A. Milla Crespo, F Fernández Cadenas, J. Fernández Bustamante, Montserrat Castañón

Bibliographic record

VenueAnales de Medicina Interna · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicCase Reports on Hematomas
Canadian institutionsCanarie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

da clásica de hipoxemia, alteraciones neurológicas (encefalopatía difusa con disminución del nivel de conciencia o afectación focal) y erupción petequial.Otros síntomas menores son taquicardia, trombopenia, fiebre, glóbulos grasos en orina o esputo, embolia retiniana y caída del hematocrito (4).El TAC cerebral puede ser normal o mostrar inicialmente áreas de alta atenuación difusas y edema cerebral y posteriormente áreas hipodensas y atrofia cerebral.La RMN cerebral parece una exploración más sensible para detectar lesiones en el síndrome de embolismo graso, presentando típicamente áreas puntiformes de baja señal en T1 y de alta señal en T2 con predominio en zonas profundas de la sustancia blanca (1,5).Se remienda su uso en aquellos casos en los que el TAC es normal y la clínica no es característica.El SPECT puede mostrar una disminución de flujo a nivel cerebral (2).El tratamiento incluye medidas de soporte con sueroterapia y soporte ventilatorio en los casos más severos.El uso de corticoides es controvertido, al igual que el periodo de corrección de la fractura, aunque parece que la fijación en las primeras 24 horas disminuye la incidencia de este síndrome.Su mortalidad es de aproximadamente el 5%, aunque en la mayoría de los casos la recuperación es completa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnales de Medicina InternaSame topicCase Reports on HematomasFrench-language works237,207