MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect Of Caffeine On Ratings Of Perceived Exertion (rpe) And Electroencephalography (eeg) Activity During Exercise

2009· article· en· W1997324560 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Gaetz, Jason P. Brandenburg

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoffee research and impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart rateCaffeinePlaceboElectroencephalographyCyclingPerceived exertionMedicineRating of perceived exertionAnesthesiaPhysical therapyCardiologyBlood pressurePsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the explanations for the ergogenic effect caffeine has on endurance performance is the reduction in RPE during exercise. The physiological mechanisms accounting for the decrease in RPE remain unclear. PURPOSE: To examine the influence of caffeine on RPE and EEG during 30 min of continuous cycling. EEG was measured to determine the degree of central nervous system functioning during exercise and possibly provide an explanation for any EEG differences due to caffeine ingestion. METHODS: 9 subjects unaccustomed to cycling performed a VO2peak test using a cycle ergometer (mean VO2peak = 35.8 ± 8.7 ml·kg-1·min-1). Subjects then returned for 2, 30-min cycling tests performed on successive days at a workload equal to approximately 60% VO2peak. Prior to the 30-min tests subjects either ingested caffeine (3 mg·kg-1) or a placebo, with the order randomized and the experimenters blinded to order. Fifteen channels of EEG were recorded according to the International 10-20 system of electrode placement. Recordings occurred prior to cycling during a warm-up, at minutes 4-5, 9-10, 14-15, 19-20, 24-25, 29-30, and during cool down. Heart rate (HR) and RPE were also collected during these periods. RESULTS: Peak RPE during the placebo trial was 16.8 ± 2.9 and during the caffeine trial RPE reached 15.8 ± 1.9. While RPE significantly increased in both trials (p = 0.002) the differences between the trials only approached significance (p = 0.074). No significant differences were observed for heart rate between the placebo and caffeine trials at any point before (102.4 ± 9.3 and 100.9 ± 13, respectively), during (peak HR 172.2 ± 18.1 and 173 ± 18.7, respectively), or after (158 ± 9.9 and 159 ± 8.5, respectively) the cycle ergometry test (p = 0.271). The expected EEG response to exercise was observed with an increase in delta wave activity and a decrease in higher frequencies such as beta1 activity (F(10,1131) = 8.326; p=0.00). No significant differences were observed for any EEG variables between the placebo and caffeine trials (p = 0.794). CONCLUSION: The absence of any differences in EEG following caffeine ingestion do not support a central nervous system basis for RPE decreases associated with caffeine ingestion during exercise. However, the findings from this study are limited by the small sample size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicCoffee research and impactsFrench-language works237,207