MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997338563 · doi:10.1021/ic3023375

Rare-Earth Manganese Copper Pnictides RE<sub>2</sub>Mn<sub>3</sub>Cu<sub>9</sub>Pn<sub>7</sub> (Pn = P, As): Quaternary Ordered Variants of the Zr<sub>2</sub>Fe<sub>12</sub>P<sub>7</sub>-Type Structure

2013· article· en· W1997338563 on OpenAlexafffund
Stanislav S. Stoyko, Krishna K. Ramachandran, C. Scott Mullen, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryCrystallographyManganeseTransition metalCopperStoichiometryElectrical resistivity and conductivityMetalSquare pyramidal molecular geometryTetrahedronSpace groupMagnetic susceptibilityHexagonal crystal systemCrystal structureX-ray crystallographyCatalysisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pnictides RE(2)Mn(3)Cu(9)Pn(7) (Pn = P, As) have been prepared by stoichiometric reaction of the elements at 800 °C. They are quaternary ordered variants of the hexagonal Zr(2)Fe(12)P(7)-type structure (Pearson symbol hP21, space group P6, Z = 1; a = 9.6444(3)-9.5970(7) Å, c = 3.9027(1)-3.7761(3) Å for RE(2)Mn(3)Cu(9)P(7) (RE = La-Nd, Sm, Gd-Dy); a = 9.9376(6)-9.9130(3) Å, c = 4.0194(2)-3.9611(1) Å for RE(2)Mn(3)Cu(9)As(7) (RE = La-Nd)). Of the four possible sites available for the transition metal, the square pyramidal site (CN5) is occupied preferentially by Mn atoms, whereas the three tetrahedral sites (CN4) are occupied by Cu atoms. On proceeding to smaller RE members in the RE(2)Mn(3)Cu(9)Pn(7) series, one of the transition-metal-centered polyhedra (Cu1) tends to become less distorted, while the remaining three (Cu2, Cu3, Mn4) become more distorted. Band structure calculations on La(2)Mn(3)Cu(9)P(7) confirm that Mn-P and Cu-P contacts provide the strongest bonding interactions. Electrical resistivity measurements on Ce(2)Mn(3)Cu(9)P(7) reveal metallic behavior with transitions at 165 and 18 K, probably of magnetic origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0090.005
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicIron-based superconductors researchFrench-language works237,207