Photoproducts of 7-Hydroxycoumarins in Aqueous Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near-UV irradiation of aqueous solutions of 7-hydroxy-6-methoxycoumarin (scopoletin) and 6,7-dihydroxycoumarin (esculetin) resulted in the formation of dimers. Substantially greater amounts of the 7-hydroxy-6-methoxycoumarin photodimer were produced compared with that of 6,7-dihydroxycoumarin. Fluorescence spectra indicated that the initial photolytic reaction involves the excited state of the phenolate form of the monomeric coumarin. The electro-spray ionization (ESI) mass spectrum suggested that the major product (with a sodiated quasimolecular ion at m/z 405) from the photolysis of scopoletin in water had formed by oxidative dimerisation and possibly had a 3,3'-bond. A second dimer (with a sodiated quasimolecular ion at m/z 407) was probably a 2 + 2 cyclodimer. This work concluded that photolysis of coumarins in water results in oxidative dimerisation whereas photolysis in the solid state or in organic solvents results in cyclodimerisation. Minor monomeric photoproducts were a dihydroxy-6-methoxycoumarin from 7-hydroxy-6-methoxycoumarin and a trihydroxycoumarin from 6,7-dihydroxycoumarin. During ESI-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), sodiated quasimolecular ions of the photodimer formed more readily than protonated quasimolecular ions and the sodiated ions did not fragment readily. Protonated quasimolecular ions of the monomeric coumarins formed more readily than their sodiated counterparts and the protonated ions fragmented to create daughter ion spectra that were useful for chemical structural assignment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".