MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997392592 · doi:10.1002/ett.4460120412

Using array signal processing to improve rural area coverage for satellite communications services

2001· article· en· W1997392592 on OpenAlexaffabout
Steven D. Blostein, Joubin Karimi

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Transactions on Telecommunications · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsNokia (Canada)Queen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReflector (photography)Payload (computing)Geostationary orbitComputer scienceInterference (communication)Communications satelliteElectronic engineeringAutomatic gain controlAntenna (radio)Parabolic antennaSatelliteSignal processingAntenna arrayTelecommunicationsEngineeringDigital signal processingOpticsPhysicsAerospace engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We address wide—area coverage for hand—held portables using an on—board signal processing satellite in geostationary (GEO) orbit at minimum payload cost. A GEO link, being power—limited, differs from terrestrial mobile communications systems that use direct radiating antennas by requiring a focal—fed parabolic reflector, which acts as a fixed analog beamformer. We propose to cascade a high—gain parabolic reflector and a digital maximum signal—to—interference—plus—noise ratio (SINR) multi—beamformer for spatial multi—user interference suppression to achieve coverage extension. This involves on—board antenna array signal processing of multiple feeds. It is shown that nearly uniform coverage of an area the size of Canada can be provided using only five parbolic reflector apertures. Compared to conventional focussed multibeam system, link margins are typically increased from a minimum requirement of 5. 25 dB to 7. 5 dB in border areas. The more uniform coverage reduces dynamic power control requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Transactions on TelecommunicationsSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207