MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997414232 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2011-006-9

Sur la borne inférieure du rang du 2-groupe de classes de certains corps multiquadratiques

2011· article· fr· W1997414232 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Mouhib

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHumanitiesCombinatoricsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Soient p 1 , p 2 , p 3 et q des nombres premiers distincts tels que p 1 ≡ p 2 ≡ p 3 ≡ – q ≡ 1 (mod 4), et Cl 2 ( k ) le 2-groupe de classes de k . A. Fröhlich a démontré que Cl 2 ( k ) n’est jamais trivial. Dans cet article, nous donnons une extension de ce résultat, en démontrant que le rang de Cl 2 ( k ) est toujours supérieur ou égal à 2. Nous démontrons aussi, que la valeur 2 est optimale pour une famille infinie de corps k .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicFinite Group Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207