MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997414232 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2011-006-9

Sur la borne inférieure du rang du 2-groupe de classes de certains corps multiquadratiques

2011· article· fr· W1997414232 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Mouhib

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHumanitiesCombinatoricsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Soient p1, p2, p3 et q des nombres premiers distincts tels que p1 ≡ p2 ≡ p3 ≡ –q ≡ 1 (mod 4), et Cl2(k) le 2-groupe de classes de k. A. Fröhlich a démontré que Cl2(k) n’est jamais trivial. Dans cet article, nous donnons une extension de ce résultat, en démontrant que le rang de Cl2(k) est toujours supérieur ou égal à 2. Nous démontrons aussi, que la valeur 2 est optimale pour une famille infinie de corps k.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicFinite Group Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207