MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997417492 · doi:10.4161/cam.4.4.12403

Tensegrin in context

2010· review· en· W1997417492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Adhesion & Migration · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCell biologyIntegrinCell migrationNeural crestContractilityVascular smooth muscleContext (archaeology)ChemistryCellBiologySmooth muscleEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

α8β1 integrin is highly expressed in cells with contractile function, such as mesangial cells of the kidneys and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Although it promotes migration of neural crest cells and breast cancer cells, recent studies suggest that α8 integrin has a negative regulatory role in VSMC migration. In this review, the question of why α8β1 integrin plays a dual role in cell migration is raised and discussed. It seems that cells require optimum contractility and balanced tensile forces for migration. α8β1 integrin promotes migration of cells that are initially in a less than optimal contractile state (e.g. neural cells) and reduces the migration of cells known as contractile cells. α8β1 integrin can be called “Tensegrin” as it fits perfectly into the tensegrity model (tensional integrity) and seems to play a prominent role in the integration of the tensile forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it