MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997440226 · doi:10.1086/511409

A Gravito‐electrostatic Sheath Model for Surface Origin of Subsonic Solar Wind Plasma

2007· article· en· W1997440226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. B. Dwivedi, Pralay Kumar Karmakar, S. C. Tripathy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSolar windPlasmaHeliosphereMach numberClassical mechanicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parker's model prediction of an unbounded solution for the supersonic solar wind plasma (SWP) requires a subsonic origin at the solar surface. The transition to supersonic SWP flow is well understood by analogy with the de Laval nozzle. The basic physics, however, of the self-consistent solar surface emission of subsonic SWP is still not very clear. We propose a theoretical model based on a gravito-electrostatic plasma sheath (GES) to investigate the surface emission mechanism of the quasi-neutral SWP. The basic equations for the interior steady state description are solved numerically as an initial-value problem under spherical geometry. A bounded solution for the solar self-gravity distribution is found to exist, meaning that a global quasi-hydrostatic equilibrium is formed at some distance from the heliocentric origin. This defines the solar surface boundary in our model, which lies at radius ξ ~ 3.5 (in units of the Jeans length). A minimum speed of ~3.0 cm s-1, corresponding to Mach number ~10-7, is obtained at this location. Consequently, a subsonic origin of the solar interior plasma flowing radially outward becomes a physical reality. Our model requires a mean electron temperature Te ~ 107 K (=1 keV) for the numerical results to match the standard solar values. The boundary is found to be negatively biased, with a normalized value of the electrostatic potential θs ~ -1 (=1 kV). It is conjectured that our model provides an interesting new physical basis for understanding the collective dynamical coupling processes of solar interior and exterior (heliosphere) regions through local, as well as global, modes of GES-induced collective waves, instabilities, and oscillations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207