The Voice of Newfoundland: A Social History of the Broadcasting Corporation of Newfoundland, 1939–1949 (review)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: The Voice of Newfoundland: A Social History of the Broadcasting Corporation of Newfoundland, 1939–1949 Bill Parenteau The Voice of Newfoundland: A Social History of the Broadcasting Corporation of Newfoundland, 1939–1949. Jeff A. Webb. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. Pp. 288, $67.00 cloth, $30.95 paper Little has been written about the development and impact of radio and television in the Atlantic Region. Survey texts and other works on the history of the region merely hint at the transformative impact that these new communication and entertainment media had on social and cultural life. Thus, Jeff Webb's The Voice of Newfoundland: A Social History of the Broadcasting Corporation of Newfoundland, 1939–1949 fills a large gap in the regional literature. However, Webb does much more than simply fill a void. The Voice of Newfoundland is a highly readable monograph that both provides a compelling account of the local interplay between radio and local politics and culture at a key moment in the history of Newfoundland, and challenges assumptions in the international literature on the early development of radio. On the local level the Voice of Newfoundland (vnof), the broadcasting arm of the Broadcasting Corporation of Newfoundland was a key element in the cultural and political changes that eventually resulted in Confederation with Canada. In 1939, the Broadcasting Corporation of Newfoundland was created by the Commission of Government to bolster economic and moral reform efforts. However, as the pressing needs and prosperity of wartime pushed the reform agenda into the background, the vnof began to take on the very different political role of acting as the informal forum for political debate. With the continuing absence of democratic government in the postwar years, the vnof provided the primary outlet for the debate between the restoration of independence for Newfoundland and Canadian Confederation. The fact that Joey Smallwood was already a popular radio personality who understood the power and potential of the medium was significant in the campaign for Confederation. Webb is particularly adept in explaining how Smallwood walked the fine line of using radio to promote Confederation as a means of falling in step the rest of North America, which was perceived by opponents as a loss of autonomy, while at the same time promoting and helping to create a sense of distinct identity in Newfoundland. One enduring theme in the international literature on radio is that state-owned broadcasters are, by definition, imbued with a sense of public service, while self-interest is the overriding motive in private broadcasting. In examining the content of the Voice of Newfoundland, Webb points out that this is too simple a dichotomy. He convincingly argues that the continuities between the private (1932–9) and public [End Page 789] (1939–49) eras of radio broadcasting were greater than the discontinuities. That is, in both of its incarnations the vnof acted as a propaganda tool for the state, and exhibited commercialism and a commitment to public service. Moreover, the content of programming changed surprisingly little after the transition from public to private broadcasting. These are insights that deserve attention in other places. It is impossible to provide a full appreciation of Webb's monograph in the space of a short review. Among other qualities, The Voice of Newfoundland is a work of subtlety and imagination that provides a compelling view of the dialectic between broadcaster and audience in the creation of culture. It deserves an international audience and should be standard reading for PhD fields in Canadian history. Bill Parenteau University of New Brunswick Copyright © 2010 University of Toronto Press
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".