MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997448624 · doi:10.1115/pvp2004-2740

Meshless Dynamic Relaxation Technique for Simulating Atomistic Models Subjected to External Forces Under the Periodic Symmetry

2004· article· en· W1997448624 on OpenAlexaff
Li Pan, Don R. Metzger, M. Niewczas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMicrostructure and mechanical properties
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraction (geology)Periodic boundary conditionsSymmetry (geometry)Dynamic relaxationBoundary value problemRelaxation (psychology)Reflection symmetryDisplacement (psychology)Translational symmetryDislocationPhysicsMechanicsMaterials scienceStatistical physicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematicsCondensed matter physicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The movement of dislocations, under the potential energy and the external driving forces, affects the performance of materials in various applications. This paper demonstrates meshless Dynamic Relaxation (DR) technique and the Embedded Atom method (EAM) potential function for simulations of the relaxation of atomistic models with dislocation defects subjected to external forces. A newly developed periodic symmetry method is incorporated into the algorithm and applied to one coordinate direction of the atomistic model, as well as the net traction on the periodic boundary in order to mimic an infinite bulk with a finite number of atoms. Output stress and displacement components are used to visualize the results and are in agreement with theoretical analysis. The numerical treatments, such as the application of the new periodic symmetry technique in the EAM potential model, the convergence criterion, the unit length, the choice of damping ratios in different cases and the stable range of net traction, are studied. The example case, which illustrates the pure edge dislocation model with and without the external force along the periodic direction, is successfully implemented and presented in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrostructure and mechanical propertiesFrench-language works237,207