MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997450449 · doi:10.1002/app.34176

Fabrication and characterization of poly‐γ‐glutamic acid nanofiber

2011· article· en· W1997450449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiopolymer Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofiberBiocompatibilityMaterials sciencePolymerElectrospinningChemical engineeringAqueous solutionAbsorption of waterSolventPolymer chemistryBiodegradationFiberComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Poly‐γ‐glutamic acid (γ‐PGA) is a natural polymer that is widely recognized as a component in the viscous filaments of fermented soybean ( natto ). γ‐PGA is known for its superior biodegradability, biocompatibility and water retention characteristics. Crosslinked γ‐PGA is commonly used as a hydrogel, but it is not used in the fiber form because it is soluble in water. In this study, we demonstrate the use of γ‐PGA‐Na for production of water insoluble γ‐PGA nanofibers by electrospinning. This result was accomplished using an aqueous solvent containing 10 wt % of an oxazoline component polymer as the crosslinking agent and by heat treatment. The crosslinking reaction was evaluated by solid‐state NMR. The nanofiber webs showed a high level of moisture absorption capability while retaining their fibrous shape. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it