MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997470880 · doi:10.1002/cmmi.378

Liposome contrast agent for CT‐based detection and localization of neoplastic and inflammatory lesions in rabbits: validation with FDG‐PET and histology

2010· article· en· W1997470880 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinzi Zheng, Christine Allen, Stefano Serra, Douglass Vines, Martin Charron, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenueContrast Media & Molecular Imaging · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineNuclear medicinePositron emission tomographyLesionHistologyStandardized uptake valueLiposomePathologyRadiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This study was aimed at assessing the performance of a liposome-based computed tomography (CT) contrast agent to detect tumor and inflammatory lesions in a rabbit model relative to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose- positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine New Zealand White rabbits were inoculated with a cell suspension obtained from the tumor tissue of a donor rabbit bearing VX2 carcinoma. Spontaneously formed inflammatory lesions were identified in the skeletal muscles of six of the nine animals. The CT liposome agent (185 +/- 37 mg/kg of iodine) was administered intravenously 7 days following tumor inoculation. The PET/CT imaging session took place five days post-liposome contrast administration and 1 h post (18)F-FDG injection (30.3 +/- 5.1 MBq/kg). Approximately 20 h post-imaging, the tumor and inflammatory lesions were excised for histo-pathology assessment. RESULTS: Liposome-CT identified the same number of primary tumors as FDG-PET (nine lesions, volumes = 0.07-7.01 cm(3), SUV(max) = 1.5-10.9, HU(mean) = 103.0-140.6). It also detected 25 inflammatory lesions (volumes = 0.01-2.73 cm(3), HU(mean) = 114.5-268.6), while FDG-PET identified seven (volumes = 0.05-1.04 cm(3), SUV(max) = 2.7-7.1). Differences in the mean CT signal (HU(mean)) between the tumor and inflammatory lesions were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Partial volume adjusted SUV(max) values for the two lesion types calculated from the FDG-PET data set did not yield a significant difference (p > 0.15). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that liposome-CT can be considered for effective screening of neoplastic and inflammatory diseases, as well as subsequent image-guided biopsy. Moreover, the differential accumulation of the liposomal agent at tumor and inflammatory sites highlights its potential role in increasing the specificity of image-based diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContrast Media & Molecular ImagingSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207