MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997479612 · doi:10.1530/rep-07-0328

Prostaglandins and the initiation of blastocyst implantation and decidualization

2007· review· en· W1997479612 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDecidualizationBlastocystEndometriumTrophoblastVascular permeabilityProstaglandinBiologyAndrologyEmbryoCell biologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyPregnancyEmbryogenesisMedicineFetusPlacentaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The process of blastocyst implantation in mammals is remarkably variable, especially in the extent of trophoblast invasion of the endometrium. In most species studied, the earliest macroscopically identifiable sign of blastocyst implantation is an increase in endometrial vascular permeability in areas adjacent to the blastocysts. This is followed in species with invasive implantation by decidualization, again localized to areas adjacent to the blastocysts. In some species, the application of a stimulus to the endometrium can result in increased endometrial vascular permeability and decidualization. Based initially on studies utilizing inhibitors of prostaglandin (PG) synthesis and more recently on studies using the techniques of transgenics, considerable evidence has accumulated indicating that PGs have an important role in the early events of implantation and artificially induced decidualization. However, which PGs are involved remains controversial. There may be differences between species, and different PGs may be involved at different times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it