A Participatory Approach to Water Management: Irrigation Advisory Committees in Southern Ontario
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Irrigated agriculture in Ontario is a significant economic driver and contributes to the worldwide need for food and fibre. Although water resources are relatively abundant in Ontario, there are water conflicts in some locations, particularly when irrigation is common. By involving the local community in water management, conflicts over water may be dealt with successfully through mechanisms other than regulation. The benefits of community development and local management of conflict include: lower cost, win–win outcomes, local control and wider compliance. Irrigation Advisory Committees (IACs) have been established in southern Ontario to assist in managing the available water resources among irrigators without disrupting the natural functions of the streams. While IACs have no specific legislative authority they successfully promote cooperation amongst users, allow for communication between regulatory agencies and users, provide informal mediation in the case of conflicts and serve as a forum for education of irrigators. The IAC structure is an example of successful, local, self–management of conflict in natural resources. L'agriculture irriguée est un important moteur économique en Ontario et contribue aux besoins mondiaux d'aliments et de fibres textiles. Malgré l'abondance relative des ressources hydriques en Ontario, des conflits d'utilisation de l'eau existent dans certaines localités, surtout lorsque l'irrigation est courante. En impliquant la communauté locale dans la gestion de l'eau, ces conflits peuvent être réglés de façon satisfaisante en faisant appel à des méthodes autres que la réglementation. Les avantages du développement communautaire et de la gestion locale des conflits incluent : coûts inférieurs, résultats gagnant–gagnant, contrôle local et respect plus généralisé. Des comités consultatifs pour l'irrigation (CCI) ont été établis dans le Sud de l'Ontario pour appuyer la gestion des ressources hydriques disponibles entre les irrigateurs sans bouleverser les fonctions naturelles des cours d'eau. Les CCI supportent la coopération entre les utilisateurs, facilitent la communication entre les agences réglementaires et les utilisateurs, fournissent une médiation informelle dans les cas de conflits et servent de forum pour l'éducation des irrigateurs. Les CCI n'ont pas d'autorisation légale. La structure des CCI est un exemple réussi d'auto–gestion de conflits dans l'utilisation des ressources naturelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it