Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une interrogation sur le temps du récit raconté, l’article trace les contours de ce que l’on pourrait appeler la présence narrative. Loin d’être une simple question de temps verbal, la présence narrative implique une mémoire complexe que le raconteur tresse sous un mode spécifique, celui du secret. Il s’agit donc d’examiner les liens entre récit, mémoire et secret, pour ensuite proposer une lecture de L’appareil-photo de Jean-Philippe Toussaint. L’hypothèse suivant laquelle la mémoire à l’oeuvre dans le récit de Toussaint est non seulement littéraire mais aussi cinématographique ouvre à l’idée d’une mémoire non seulement intertextuelle mais aussi intermédiale (ce qui veut dire que les qualités propres à un médium donné peuvent se déplacer d’un milieu à un autre); quant au secret, il débouche sur un questionnement des mutations contemporaines du récit dans le milieu hypertextuel en pleine expansion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".