An Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Asymmetric Lithiation of 1,2,3,5,6,7-Hexahydro-3a,4a-diazacyclopenta[<i>def</i>]phenanthren-4-one
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inability of bis-N-Boc-protected octahydrophenanthroline to undergo asymmetric lithiation with (-)-sparteine is circumvented by use of a urea functionality as the directing group. Asymmetric lithiation followed by electrophile quench gives products substituted alpha to nitrogen in better yield (17-30%) but slightly lower enantiomeric ratio (er 84:16) than analogous lithiation of N-Boc-piperidine (er 87:13). Computational studies at the MP2/6-316(d)//B3LYP/6-316(d) level indicate that the prochiral equatorial S-hydrogen is removed preferentially over the pro-R hydrogen, with a difference in transition state activation energies of 1.26 kcal/mol, corresponding to a predicted er of 89:11. The predicted stereochemistry of the reaction was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray analysis of an aryl dibromide prepared from the enantiomerically enriched alpha-methyl-substituted product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".