Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude sur les pratiques linguistiques des jeunes franco-manitobains, leur sentiment d'appartenance à la communauté française, leurs affiliations culturelles subjectives et les effets de ces facteurs en ce qui a trait au choix du partenaire affectif et, éventuellement, du futur conjoint suggère que l'assimilation linguistique observée au Manitoba n'est pas seulement le résultat d'une augmentation de l'exogamie. Outre, bien entendu, les contraintes structurelles multiples, parmi lesquelles il faut compter le nombre, la densité des francophones ainsi que l'étendue et l'influence relative de leur réseau institutionnel, l'assimilation serait la conséquence d'un phénomène plus large: la modernisation des communautés canadiennes françaises, leur acculturation aux valeurs par lesquelles la société canadienne se caractérise elle-même, telles que les libertés et droits individuels, l'égalité des chances. Or, l'adoption des valeurs de la modernité tend à miner la substance sinon la valorisation idéologique des traditions, le maintien de communautés homogènes et endogames, malgré la politique officielle canadienne de reconnaissance et de promotion des minorités de langue officielle et autres groupes culturels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".