Towards a formal representation of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of comorbid patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are standardized guidelines in prescribing the most appropriate medical treatment to patients with regard to relevant patient data and possible diagnoses. However due to the complexity it involves, concurrent applications of CPGs for the treatment of comorbid patients is quite limited in practice and accordingly the availability of foundational frameworks that supports formal CPG representation and reasoning is essential. In this paper, we propose adopting SCOPE (Situation Calculus Ontology of PEtri Nets), a formal framework that is based on Petri Nets and the Situation Calculus, for the CPG mitigation and integration. In particular, we argue that critical attributes such as iterations, concurrency, time and etc. that are needed to fully describe knowledge for the mitigation/integration of CPGs can be conveniently captured within this framework. An illustrative mitigation example is also given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it