MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997648388 · doi:10.1109/asonam.2012.239

Lessons from a Jihadi Corpus

2012· article· en· W1997648388 on OpenAlex
David B. Skillicorn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAuthorship Attribution and Profiling
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeceptionRank (graph theory)Ranking (information retrieval)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Natural language processingArtificial intelligenceFactor (programming language)PsychologySocial psychologyMathematicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the posts in the Islamic Awareness forum, using models for frequent words (content), for Salafist-Jihadist language, and for deception. These last two models each produce a single-factor ranking enabling, in each case, the most useful subset of posts to be selected for further analysis. Posts that rank highly for Salafist-Jihadist language rank low for deception, suggesting that faking extremist websites is probably an ineffective strategy. The process described here is a template for analysis of many kinds of open-source corpora where language models of what makes posts interesting are known.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingFrench-language works237,207