An Enhanced System for Construction of Adenoviral Vectors by the Two-Plasmid Rescue Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The two-plasmid rescue method of constructing Ad vectors, which relies on either homologous or Cre-mediated recombination between two plasmids cotransfected into 293 or 293Cre4 cells, respectively, offers advantages over other approaches because of its simplicity. We have improved the efficiency of vector construction by both homologous and Cre-mediated recombination by replacing the single ITR in the shuttle plasmid with a head-to-head ITR junction. We have also expanded the versatility of this method by incorporating a Cre expression cassette into the plasmids to permit high-efficiency Cre-mediated vector rescue using 293 cells, abrogating the need for Cre-expressing cell lines. This new system retains the simplicity of the original but results in an approximately 100-fold increase in the number of recombinant viruses produced, all of which contain the foreign DNA insert, and allows high-efficiency Cre-mediated vector isolation using any E1-complementing cell line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".