MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997689130 · doi:10.1002/mop.28690

Erratum for: Single‐layer polarization‐switchable frequency‐band‐fixed microstrip antenna using a single‐switch

2014· erratum· en· W1997689130 on OpenAlexaff
Soon‐Soo Oh, Wook‐Ki Park, Chi‐Hyung Ahn, L. Shafai

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2014
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersKorea Basic Science InstituteKorea Institute of Science and TechnologyMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuKorea UniversityChosun University
KeywordsMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaMaterials scienceMicrostripMicrowaveOptoelectronicsOpticsAntenna (radio)Radiation patternElectrical engineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A single‐layer polarization‐switchable frequency‐bandfixed microstrip square‐ring antenna was developed. The copolar plane of the radiation pattern was reconfigured with a single‐switch, but the resonant frequencies were identical. A microstrip square‐ring antenna was adopted, and the lateral and vertical widths of the microstrip ring were tuned to agree the resonant frequencies of the unloaded or loaded antenna. A single‐layer dielectric substrate was used instead of a latest three‐layer configuration. Antenna impedance was optimized to a value between those of the loaded and unloaded antennas. The proposed antenna exhibited single‐switch polarization–reconfiguration on a single‐layer substrate, and could thus be used in mobile communications and microwave imaging systems. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 56:1874–1879, 2014

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207