MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997694198 · doi:10.1117/12.916488

Plasmon mediated polymerization on the surface of silver nanoparticles for advancements in photolithographic patterning

2012· article· en· W1997694198 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin G. Stamplecoskie, J. C. Scaiano

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoparticlePolymerizationSurface plasmonPhotolithographyPolymerLocalized surface plasmonSilver nanoparticleSurface plasmon resonancePlasmonChemical engineeringDielectricNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal nanoparticles and their plasmon excitation have been used to enhance spectroscopic transitions and chemistry on metal nanoparticle surfaces. The size and shape of the enhancement area around the nanoparticles is dependant on the size, shape, dielectric constant of the matrix and the metal. We have recently reported on the use of plasmon excitation to induce acrylic polymerization on the surface of silver nanoparticles and have made ~10 nm polymer features far below the diffraction limit using visible LED irradiation. The acrylic polymerization takes advantage of plasmon enhanced excitation of azo photoinitiators in the vicinity of nanoparticles, causing cross-linking only in the enhancement region. The formation of a cross-linked polymer on the surface of the particles causes a solubility switch, where the regions unaffected by irradiation remain soluble and can be selectively washed away leaving behind the AgNP with a polymer coating. Plasmon excitation also generates a large local temperature gradients on the surface of nanoparticles and a measureable macroscopically amount of heat. The heat generated near the surface of particles can also be used to induce thermal processes with high spatial control. This spatial and temporal control over localized heating can also be used to initiate chemistry on the surface of particles relevant to the next generation of photolithography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207