MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997702189 · doi:10.1037/h0087221

Investigation of the heterogeneity of disruptive behaviour in elementary-age children.

2004· article· en· W1997702189 on OpenAlex
Daniel A. Waschbusch, Stephen Porter, Normand Carrey, S. Omar Kazmi, Kerry A. Roach, Delia A. D'Amico

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous avons evalue les evaluations des parents et enseignants d'un grand echantillon (N = 1579) d'enfants canadiens a l'ecole elementaire afin de determiner comment differentes conceptualisations d'un comportement perturbateur sont interreliees et reliees a d'autres mesures du fonctionnement. L'appreciation des parents et des enseignants etait uniforme et suggerait trois aspects distincts mais corelies de comportement perturbateur chez l'enfant : 1) comportement reactif/oppositionnel, 2) comportement proactif/sans pitie et 3) comportement d'inattention-impulsif-hyperactif. Ces comportements se rapportaient de facon unique et significative aux scores de diagnostic DSM-IV et a d'autres mesures de deficience, indiquant qu'ils mesurent des aspects distincts du comportement perturbateur chez l'enfant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it