MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997743075 · doi:10.2118/147474-ms

Shear Dilatancy in Unconsolidated Laboratory Samples Improves Relative Permeability Performance

2011· article· en· W1997743075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hasnain A. Khan, Jon E. Olson, Jon Holder

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Texas at Austin
KeywordsDilatantStress pathPermeability (electromagnetism)Geotechnical engineeringRelative permeabilityShearing (physics)PorosityShear (geology)GeologyMaterials scienceRelative densityShear stressResidual strengthEffective stressOverburden pressureComposite materialMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) can cause dilatant shear failure in unconsolidated heavy oil reservoirs. Our experimental work documents changes induced by such shear failure in absolute permeability, relative permeability to oil and water, and residual saturations. Tests were performed on 2 inch diameter synthetic specimens made from lower fine to medium grain size Ottawa sand formed with wet vibration to an initial porosity of about 32%. Loading paths included triaxial compression and radial extension. Axial and volumetric strains were measured directly during deformation, and single and two phase permeability tests were executed at axial strains of 1 to 10%. Triaxial compression tests followed a path of increasing mean stress (under constant confining stress) while radial extension tests provided a decreasing mean stress loading path (reducing confining stress under constant axial stress). The relative permeability was determined by the unsteady state method for relative permeability endpoint assessment. Results show similar absolute permeability trends to those published by others, but our multiphase measurements appear unique. Relative permeabilities are more strongly influenced by shearing, with water relative permeabilities being increase by as much as a factor of 2. The effect seems to be slightly greater for finer grain sand than for the medium grain size. Absolute permeability changes were greatest for the samples with the lowest initial porosity, which would include those that were poorer sorted. Poorer sorting of the sand pack seems to reduce the impact on relative permeability changes, however. Residual oil saturations were reduced from 0.28 to 0.13 in the lower fine Ottawa sample, suggesting the possibility for significant improvement in oil recovery when the sand is sheared. During triaxial testing, it was interesting to note that at 50 psi effective confining stress, absolute permeability increased with shearing, but at 200 psi effective confining stress, absolute permeability was reduced, even though the volumetric strain was still dilatant. In addition to providing new data on the magnitude of absolute permeability and multiphase flow properties for unconsolidated sands, this paper also demonstrates that dilatant shear failure does not guarantee increased flow capacity for such rocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Unconventional Resources ConferenceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207