MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997757817 · doi:10.1081/lcss-200030663

Important Factors Affecting Biosolid Nitrogen Mineralization in Soils

2004· article· en· W1997757817 on OpenAlexaff
Fatih Er, F. D. Mikayilov, A. R. Mermut

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralization (soil science)Soil waterNitrogenNitrogen cycleEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceBiosolidsAgronomyChemistrySoil scienceBiologyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Biosolid nitrogen (N) ammonification, followed by nitrification in soil, produces nitrate ( ), which is not only a plant nutrient, but also a contaminant for ground water. Determining the most relevant factors influencing mineralization will help to manage N in biosolid-treated soils. Biosolid application rate, biosolid carbon (C):N ratio, biosolid organic N content, biosolid type, soil organic N content, soil pH, temperature, and time were compared among 12 published studies. Biosolid application rate, biosolid C:N ratio, and temperature significantly affected the mineralization rate and accounted up to 87% of the final model variability (R 2 = 79.1). Although the partial coefficients for soil pH and a dummy variable for biosolid were significant in the final model, their total contribution to the sum of partial coefficients was low (13%). There is insufficient evidence to conclude that soil organic N content and time contribute to biosolid N mineralization variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207