MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997806823 · doi:10.1063/1.2430518

Electron beam-plasma interaction: Linear theory and Vlasov-Poisson simulations

2007· article· en· W1997806823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsWave packetElectronDispersion relationAtomic physicsVlasov equationPlasmaPhase velocityPlasma oscillationExcited stateWavelengthBeam (structure)Superposition principleRelativistic electron beamElectromagnetic electron waveComputational physicsCathode rayCondensed matter physicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of a weak (nb∕ne∼10−3) electron beam interaction with plasma is investigated by means of linear dispersion theory and electrostatic Vlasov simulations. In the case of a warm electron beam only Langmuir-type modes in a finite wavelength band are excited. Cold beams undergo rapid heating, after which the long-wavelength Langmuir and electron-acoustic modes are damped. As the waves decelerate and heat the beam, new modes with larger wave numbers and smaller phase velocities are excited, while the fastest-growing modes saturate at a finite level. The superposition of these modes with frequencies near electron plasma frequency ωpe and broad k spectrum results in long quasiregular wave packets. The wave packets propagate slowly with group velocities typically 30 times smaller than the phase velocities and are weakly damped by the background electrons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it