Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aspects of T4 lysozyme dynamics and solvent interaction are investigated using atomically detailed Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. Two spin-labeled mutants of T4 lysozyme are analyzed (T4L-N40C and T4L-K48C), which have been found from electronic paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments to exhibit different mobilities at the site of spin probe attachment (N- and C-terminus of helix B, respectively). Similarities and differences in solvent distribution and diffusion around the spin label, as well as around exposed and buried residues within the protein, are discussed. The purpose is to capture possible strong interactions between the spin label (ring) and solvent molecules, which may affect EPR lineshapes. The effect of backbone motions on the water density profiles is also investigated. The focus is on the domain closure associated with the T4 lysozyme hinge-bending motion, which is analyzed by Essential Dynamics (ED). The N-terminus of helix B is found to be a "hinge" residue, which explains the high degree of flexibility and motional freedom at this site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".