MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997828777 · doi:10.1149/1.3505042

A Pore-Scale Model of Oxygen Reduction in Ionomer-Free Catalyst Layers of PEFCs

2010· article· en· W1997828777 on OpenAlexafffund
Karen Chan, Michael Eikerling

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsBC Innovation CouncilSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimon Fraser University
KeywordsElectrolyteCharge densityNernst equationMaterials scienceElectrokinetic phenomenaIonomerChemical physicsPlatinumChemistryPolymerElectrodeCatalysisNanotechnologyComposite materialPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a model for oxygen reduction in water-filled, cylindrical nanopores with platinum walls.At one end, the pores are in contact with a polymer electrolyte membrane.The electrostatic interaction of the protons with the charged pore walls drives proton migration into the ionomer-free channels.We employ the Stern model to relate the surface charge density at the pore walls to the electrode potential.Proton and potential distributions within the pores are governed by the Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory and the oxygen distribution by Fick's law.Assuming a small local current density from oxygen reduction, we found an approximate analytical solution to the transport equations.The metal surface charge density and the corresponding proton conductivity of the pores are tuned by the deviation of the electrode potential from the potential of zero charge of the metal phase, which is the key determinant of the effectiveness of platinum utilization.Other determinants of pore performance are the Helmholtz capacitance, electrokinetic parameters, and pore size and length.Upon upscaling, the model is consistent with polarization data for ionomerfree, ultrathin catalyst layers in polymer electrolyte fuel cells PEFCs.We discuss the implications of the model for the materials selection and nanostructural design of such catalyst layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations105
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207