Distinct endoplasmic reticulum stress responses are triggered during human liver transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Injury due to cold ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) represents a major cause of primary graft non-function following human liver transplantation. This major cellular response translates into a dramatic decrease in intracellular ATP concentration during the ischaemic phase, thus sensitizing cells to reperfusion shock. We postulated that IR-induced cellular damage might cause alterations of the secretory pathway, particularly at the level of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) function. Under these circumstances, the ER triggers an adaptive response named the 'unfolded protein response' (UPR). In this study, we show that the expression of BiP, CHOP/GADD153 and GADD34, known to be induced specifically upon ER stress, are differentially affected upon IR, thus suggesting that distinct ER stress responses are activated during each phase of transplantation. With an approach combining semi-quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting using phospho-specific antibodies, we show that the IRE-1 pathway is activated upon early ischaemia and, in a second phase, upon early reperfusion. This occurs through the atypical splicing of XBP-1 mRNA, its translation into a transcriptionally active XBP-1 protein and the subsequent increase in EDEM mRNA expression, and may also contribute to the observed reperfusion-induced activation of MAPK/SAPK. In contrast, we demonstrate that the PERK pathway, leading to inhibition of cap-dependent translation, is mainly activated upon reperfusion, as shown by PERK and eIF2alpha phosphorylation. PERK activation is detected restrictively in sinusoidal endothelial cells and could contribute to the exaggerated sensivity of this liver cell type to IR injury. These results correlate well with the observed defect in protein secretion and suggest that the biphasic ER stress response may influence liver secretory functions and, as a consequence, condition liver transplantation outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".