MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997877615 · doi:10.7202/1001083ar

Are you talking to me? Les enjeux du women’s cinema pour un regard féministe

2011· article· fr· W1997877615 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Chantal Nadeau

Bibliographic record

VenueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterHumanitiesArtArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir d’une analyse critique et féministe de la construction d’un regard sexué au cinéma, le présent texte confronte deux pratiques cinématographiques divergentes : le women’s cinema et le woman’s film . L’argumentation vise principalement à voir comment chacune des pratiques cinématographiques articule une représentation de la femme selon l’axe objet/sujet du regard. Trois analyses filmiques sont ainsi menées de front : The Berlin Affair de Liliana Cavani et A Winter Tan de Jackie Burroughs, reconnues comme des stratégies de référence, répondant au projet politique du women’s cinema et Thelma & Louise de Ridley Scott positionné sous l’angle remodelé mais traditionnel du woman’s film.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiquesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207