Optical symmetries and anisotropic transport in high-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>superconductors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple symmetry analysis of in-plane and out-of-plane transport in a family of high-temperature superconductors is presented. It is shown that generalized scaling relations exist between the low-frequency electronic Raman response and the low-frequency in-plane and out-of-plane conductivities in both normal and superconducting states of the cuprates. Specifically, for both normal and superconducting states, the temperature dependence of the low-frequency ${B}_{1g}$ Raman slope scales with the c-axis conductivity, while the ${B}_{2g}$ Raman slope scales with the in-plane conductivity. Comparison with experiments in the normal states of Bi-2212 and Y-123 implies that the nodal transport is largely doping independent and metallic, while transport near the Brillouin Zone axes is governed by a quantum critical point near doping $p\ensuremath{\sim}0.22$ holes per ${\mathrm{CuO}}_{2}$ plaquette. Important differences for La-214 are discussed. It is also shown that the c-axis conductivity rise for $T\ensuremath{\ll}{T}_{c}$ is a consequence of partial conservation of in-plane momentum for out-of-plane transport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".