MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997897225 · doi:10.1039/c2cp40160f

Structural phase transitions induced by pressure in ammonium borohydride

2012· article· en· W1997897225 on OpenAlexafffund
Roxana Flacau, Yansun Yao, D. D. Klug, Serge Desgreniers, Christopher I. Ratcliffe

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemRietveld refinementRaman spectroscopyPowder diffractionCrystallographyBorohydrideDiffractionAb initioPhase (matter)ChemistrySynchrotron radiationPhase transitionAb initio quantum chemistry methodsX-ray crystallographyMaterials scienceCrystal structureThermodynamicsMoleculeOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A combined experimental and theoretical study of hydrogen-rich ammonium borohydride (NH4BH4) subjected to pressures up to 10 GPa indicates two phase transitions, detected by synchrotron radiation powder X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics calculations, at 1.5 and 3.4 GPa. The ambient pressure, face-centred cubic phase of NH4BH4 transforms into a highly disordered intermediate structure which then evolves upon increasing pressure into an orthorhombic, distorted CsCl structure. The structure of the latter phase was solved using ab initio computational techniques and from a Rietveld full pattern refinement of the powder X-ray diffraction data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207