Thoracic and Lumbar Epidural Analgesia via the Caudal Approach Using Electrical Stimulation Guidance in Pediatric Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nerve stimulation guidance (Tsui test) has been reported to be an effective alternative to radiographic imaging for proper catheter placement. The purpose of this study was to examine the success rate and complications of continuous caudal epidural analgesia since the implementation of routine use of the Tsui test at the authors' institution. METHODS: The authors examined prospectively collected data in their pediatric pain service database from 289 children who had attempted caudal placement of a lumbar or thoracic catheter between 1999 and 2002. RESULTS: In five patients (aged 5 months-1.6 yr), the catheter did not thread to the desired level and was abandoned in the operating room (technical success rate, 98.2%). Of the remaining 284 patients, the overall analgesic success rate of all caudal route epidural analgesia procedures was 84.9%. There was no significant difference in adequate pain control (success) in infants (aged 1 day-1 yr) versus older children (aged younger than 1 yr). The most common adverse effects were pruritus (26.1%) and nausea and vomiting (16.9%). Of the patients in our study, 57.7% had urinary catheters in situ; of those who did not have a catheter placed, 20.8% experienced urinary retention. The incidence of respiratory depression was 4.2%, but the administration of naloxone for severe respiratory depression was never necessary. Three percent of catheters were removed because of suspected contamination, but no epidural abscesses or systemic infection were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that epidural catheter placement via the caudal approach using the Tsui test is an effective and reasonable alternative to direct lumbar and thoracic epidural analgesia in pediatric patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".