MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997969854 · doi:10.1364/ofc.2012.om2h.1

A 400G/1T High Spectral Efficiency Technology and Some Enabling Subsystems

2012· article· en· W1997969854 on OpenAlexaff
Maurice O’Sullivan, Charles Laperle, A. Borowiec, K.S. Farley

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Fiber Communication Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsCiena (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationComputer sciencePublishingWorld Wide WebTelecommunicationsMultimediaPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Get PDF Email Share Share with Facebook Tweet This Post on reddit Share with LinkedIn Add to CiteULike Add to Mendeley Add to BibSonomy Get Citation Copy Citation Text M. O'Sullivan, C. Laperle, A. Borowiec, and K. Farley, "A 400G/1T High Spectral Efficiency Technology and Some Enabling Subsystems," in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, OSA Technical Digest (Optica Publishing Group, 2012), paper OM2H.1. Export Citation BibTex Endnote (RIS) HTML Plain Text Citation alert Save article

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Fiber Communication ConferenceSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207