Structural and mechanical characterization of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) and sulfonated PEEK films: Effects of thermal history, sulfonation, and preparation conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work, virgin and sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) films (PEEK and SPEEK, respectively) have been studied by dynamic mechanical analysis, modulated differential scanning calorimetry, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, birefringence, and optical microscopy. The properties of the unmodified polymer have been addressed to assess the original morphological characteristics and the changes induced by sulfonation. In general, the introduction of ionic groups in the polymer backbone alters dramatically the intrinsic properties of the parent material. The particular thermomechanical response exhibited by PEEK and SPEEK samples, characterized by a hysteresis loop, can be explained by the reversible and irreversible relaxation–orientation of the microstructure, even in the sub‐ T g region. The results showed that the preparation conditions largely determine the nonequilibrium morphological features of both compression‐molded PEEK films and solvent‐cast SPEEK membranes. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 756–774, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".