MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998015543 · doi:10.1021/bm8013632

Controlling Burst and Final Drug Release Times from Porous Polylactide Devices Derived from Co-continuous Polymer Blends

2009· article· en· W1998015543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomacromolecules · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymerChemical engineeringPolystyreneSurface modificationBovine serum albuminPolyelectrolytePorosityMaterials scienceAdsorptionChromatographyDrug deliveryControlled releaseChemistryPolymer chemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work has demonstrated that it is possible to exercise a wide range of control over both the initial burst release and the final drug release times from porous polylactide (PLA) devices derived from cocontinuous polymer blends. Two strategies were used: a layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte surface deposition approach on the porous PLA surface and the application of a partially closed-cell protocol. A PLA porous substrate with a pore size of 1.5 microm, derived from a blend of PLA and polystyrene (PS) via selective solvent extraction of the PS phase, was used as the drug delivery device. The surface area and pore dimensions were examined via BET nitrogen adsorption and image analysis. Porous PLA substrates with 0, 3, and 5 layers of polyelectrolytes and with open areas of 100, 12, and 2% were studied both separately and in combination. In vitro release tests were performed to study the release profile of bovine serum albumin (BSA) from the devices via UV spectrophotometry. It is shown that, while both are important, surface modification is more dominant in controlling the release rate than the partially closed cell approach. When a five layer surface modification of the PLA and a partially closed cell approach (2% open area) are combined, denoted as the L5C sample, the synergy is dramatic with a 5x reduction in the first two hour burst release amount and a total release time that is extended by 123x as compared to the 100% open cell, surface unmodified, reference sample. The L5C sample ultimately releases 89% of the total BSA loaded, demonstrating the high level of interconnectivity of the microchannels in the porous PLA. The mechanism of release in this system is clearly diffusion controlled with well-defined concentration gradients, as measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), observed in the direction of release. These results point toward a diffusion mechanism combined with a sorption/desorption interaction of the BSA with the modified PLA surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it