Postharvest Survey of Spring Wheat Fields Initially Assessed for Gene Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Recent research has addressed the potential for gene flow in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). However, there is scant information on the fate of introgressed genes in the subsequent crop rotation. The objective of this study was to quantify spring wheat volunteers potentially arising from gene flow. A total of 152 wheat fields that had been used to measure gene flow at distances of up to 10 km were surveyed for blue aleurone volunteers for 3 yr postharvest. No blue aleurone seed was detected in samples from the 152 fields surveyed. A single blue aleurone volunteer plant was detected in a pollen donor field subsequently sown to wheat in the third year postharvest. The absence of blue aleurone wheat volunteers in the postharvest crop rotation was not unexpected as only four of the original 152 fields had shown evidence of gene flow. Under the environmental and crop management practices encountered in this study, the risk of a gene flow‐based adventitious event in spring wheat being detected at significant levels in subsequent crops appears low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".