MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998060077 · doi:10.1021/je049843m

Solubility of Oxygen in Aqueous Solutions of Fe(III) Complexes of <i>trans</i>-1,2-Cyclohexanediaminetetraacetic Acid (CDTA) as a Function of Temperature and Chelate Concentration

2004· article· en· W1998060077 on OpenAlexaff
Maria C. Iliuta, Faı̈çal Larachi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySolubilityAqueous solutionChelationFerrousFerricOxygenInorganic chemistryMolar solubilityOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The utilization of ferric chelates for the oxidation of the total reduced sulfurs quartet (H 2 S, CH 3 SH, CH 3 SCH 3, CH 3 S 2 CH 3 ) is one of the various approaches to mitigate the emission of these airborne pollutants from Kraft pulp-mills' effluents. Oxygen solubility in iron chelate solutions is one important parameter in designing and modeling the regeneration process from ferrous to ferric chelates. Because of the interfering oxidation occurring in Fe(II) chelate solutions, the solubility of oxygen in aqueous solutions in which the gas does not react (Fe(III) complexes of trans -1,2-cyclohexanediaminetetraacetic acid (CDTA)) was studied at pressures near atmospheric pressure and temperatures from (293 to 313) K. New experimental solubility results over a chelate concentration ranging from (38 to 124) mol·m -3 and pH values of 3 and 7.5 are reported. From the Henry's law constants and their variation with temperature, the standard thermodynamic solution properties of oxygen in these solutions were obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207