MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1998082828 · doi:10.1109/icdsp.2009.5201156

Classification of knee-joint vibroarthrographic signals using time-domain and time-frequency domain features and least-squares support vector machine

2009· article· en· W1998082828 on OpenAlexaff
Yunfeng Wu, Sridhar Krishnan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineLinear discriminant analysisWaveletPattern recognition (psychology)Time domainFrequency domainTime–frequency analysisMatching pursuitSIGNAL (programming language)Artificial intelligenceJoint (building)Least-squares function approximationComputer scienceData setSignal processingReceiver operating characteristicNonlinear systemAlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsEngineeringMachine learningDigital signal processingComputer visionPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysis of knee-joint vibration sounds, also known as vibroarthrographic (VAG) signals, could lead to a noninvasive clinical tool for early detection of knee-joint pathology. In this paper, we employed the wavelet matching pursuit (MP) decomposition and signal variability for time-frequency domain and time-domain analysis of VAG signals. The number of wavelet MP atoms and the number of significant turns detected with the fixed threshold from signal variability analysis were extracted as prominent features for the classification over the data set of 89 VAG signals. Compared with the Fisher linear discriminant analysis, the nonlinear least-squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) is able to achieve higher overall accuracy of 73.03%, and the area of 0.7307 under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207